AOPA Australia makes submission in support of flight training industry opposing international student caps

AOPA AUSTRALIA MAKES SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF FLIGHT TRAINING INDUSTRY, OPPOSING INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CAPS

Article supplied by AOPA.

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia has today submitted it’s recommendations to the Australian Government in response to the Education Services for Overseas Students Amendment (Quality and Integrity) Bill 2024, which seeks impose caps on international students participating in flight training in Australia.

“AOPA Australia has called on the Australian Government to remove limit caps on the number of international students participating in flight training.” said Benjamin Morgan, CEO.

“The caps will result in a 65% reduction in flight training activity, threatening the closure of a significant number of flight training providers nationwide, damaging our industry and reputation abroad.

“Flight training is vital to the success of the aviation industry, which collectively contributes some $69billion to the Australian economy, representing 5.5% of the nations GDP.

“I thank each of the flight training and aviation education providers who have submitted letters of endorsement for our submission and recommendations.”

Click to Download the Submission in PDF Format

SUBMISSION

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia (AOPA Australia) welcomes the opportunity to lodge a submission into the Education Services for Overseas Students Amendment (Quality and Integrity) Bill 2024.

Our recommendations in this submission are based on our direct aviation industry knowledge and our experience spanning 75 years, along with our direct consultation with CRICOS approved flight training providers nationwide, who have communicated their concerns and alarms in individual submissions to the Senate Inquiry.

Whilst AOPA Australia understands the desire to create a stronger strategically managed approach to migration and international student education, we urge the Government to give priority consideration to the critical role that flight training plays in support of Australia’s domestic and international aviation economies.

Likewise, we urge the government to recognise that international students participating in flight training in Australia are unique and of high-value, possessing advanced English language skills, have been subjected to rigorous academic and psychometric testing and assessment, have submitted themselves for high-level security screening, have demonstrated strong financial backing and are obligated to return to their home nation airlines following completion of their training and education to commence employment.

It is estimated that over $200million is being directly invested into Australia’s flight training and aviation industry by international students, each contributing approx. $150,000 AUD towards their training and education, their accommodation and living expenses.

AOPA Australia does not believe the amendment bill has been adequately consulted and that the government is not fully aware of the impacts (both planned and unintended) that the Amendment Bill will have on Australia’s flight training providers and subsequently our aviation industry and national economy.

AOPA Australia understands that cap limits have been calculated using data from providers for the period of 2019-2023, a time during which international and domestic COVID-19 lockdowns, travel restrictions and other limitations were in force.  As such, the international student numbers during this period were abnormally low and do not represent the anticipated demand for 2025 and beyond.

Should the Amendment Bill be introduced and cap limits set using the 2019-2023 data it will result in reducing Australia’s intake of international students for pilot training by some 65% or more and will result in provider location closures, skilled aviation job losses and significant reductions in our domestic flight training capabilities.

Such an outcome will place the government at crossed purpose, conflicting with the intent, objectives and policies of the Department of Infrastructure’s recently released ‘Aviation White Paper – Towards 2050’ that has recognised the significant pilot, flight instructor and aircraft engineer skills shortages facing the nation.

A key outcome of the Aviation White Paper is to ‘simplify the visa process for pilots and other highly skilled aviation workers to address the shortage of pilots and instructors in the GA sector and allow easier entry into the Australian labour market’.

The Amendment Bill will cause significant harm to Australia’s standing as a world class flight training provider nation, undermining many decades of aviation industry marketing and promotional investment, encouraging international pilot applicants to seek training with competitor nations.  Flight training is a highly competitive international industry, and should Australia lose it’s standing, it may take many decades to recover.

Importantly, the Amendment Bill will result in creating significant business investment uncertainty, given that there has been no direct consultation with the aviation industry and that the government appears to be forcing an outcome that will result in significant financial damage to flight training providers.

Flight training organisations operate within a highly regulated and cost-saturated environment and require significant capital investment in facilities, aircraft fleets, skilled personnel and time.  Flight training organisations rely on a carefully managed balance of both domestic and international student training to remain sustainable.  Operators cannot be expected to make the significant investments if they are exposed to the risk of government changing policy at a whim and without consideration as to the outcome.

Lastly, the Amendment Bill will create further knock-on impacts on integrated aviation suppliers such as aircraft maintenance providers, engine overhaul facilities, propellor overhaul facilities, avionics suppliers and more, should the caps force flight training provider closures.  Such outcomes will create lasting and broad damage to Australia’s domestic aviation industry capability that may take decades to recover.

SUBMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Pause the application of cap limits on flight training providers;
  2. Undertake a thorough review of the anticipated and unintended consequences of the Amendment Bill on flight training providers and the supporting aviation industry.
  3. Undertake a thorough review of international student training numbers by all approved flight training organisations, including a review of forward-looking demand for 2025 and beyond.
  4. Form an Aviation Industry Advisory Panel comprised of relevant industry associations/peak-bodies and aviation organisations, to provide direct feedback as Subject Matter Experts to the Department and all relevant stakeholders.
  5. Align and harmonise the Amendment Bill with the intent and objectives of the Department of Infrastructure’s Aviation White Paper, to ensure the government is not at cross-purpose in meeting the critical challenges facing aviation.
  6. Align and harmonise the Amendment Bill with the objectives of Industry Skills Australia.

AOPA AUSTRALIA HOSTED ROUND-TABLE

In response to the government’s planned changes, AOPA Australia hosted an Aviation Flight Training Providers round-table on the 11th of September 2024.  Six (6) CRICOS approved Flight Training Providers were in attendance, representing a diverse cross section of providers nationwide.  Direct telephone consultation was conducted with a further five (5) providers, which echoed the responses of the round-table participants.

The purpose of the roundtable was to seek to understand the concerns of flight training providers and to understand the impacts that the government-imposed caps on their businesses and the broader aviation industry.

Summary of the roundtable and telephone consultation outcomes

  1. That no direct aviation flight training industry consultation was conducted by the Department or any other government representative. None of the Flight Training Providers were aware of any formal government working group, panel or consultative process outside of an invitation to make a submission to the Senate Inquiry, through which direct consultation could have been engaged.
  2. The group understood the government’s efforts to ensure integrity and quality of the overall system. However, the group regarded aviation flight training providers as caught up in broader challenges and problems that were not related to the performance or quality of flight training providers within the system.
  3. The group agreed that international students participating in flight training, were involved in a highly technical education process, with each student required to make considerable investment and commitments.
  4. That on receipt of written notice from the government, Flight Training Providers learned that a cap would be placed on their 2025 enrolments. The communicated cap would cut international student enrolment numbers by more than 50%, but with examples as high as 90%, whilst there was one example of no reduction.
  5. That there appeared to be no structured methodology with respect to how the cap was calculated and that the government appeared to be basing assessments on the 2019-2023 period, during which the flight training industry has not yet recovered to pre COVID-19 levels. All but one roundtable participant communicated that the caps are significantly lower than their anticipated demand for the 2025 year ahead.
  6. The majority of the roundtable participants stressed that the caps would result in significant damage to the Australian flight training industry’s global reputation and that it could take many years to recover from such an outcome.
  7. Roundtable participants detailed that their international marketing efforts involved significant financial and time investments, and that the imposed caps would make such engagement financially unsustainable.
  8. The majority of the roundtable participants reported that their flight training businesses were a mix of domestic and international students combined, with each cohort balancing the providers overall financial sustainability. Most of the roundtable participants reported that should the caps be enforced for 2025, it would result in significant negative business impacts, resulting in location closures, instructor and supporting staff layoffs and the disposal of aircraft fleets and equipment.

CRITICAL AVIATION BACKGROUND & REFERENCE INFORMATION


Aviation is a vital pillar of the national Australian economy

Aviation contributes some $69billion to the Australian economy and represents 5.5% of GDP.

Over 716,000 Australian jobs are in support of the aviation industry.

It is widely understood and has been recognised by the Australian government that demand for qualified pilots, engineers and supporting aviation personnel will outstrip our domestic supply capacity, with an anticipated 63% growth across the next 20 years.

(Reference:  https://www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/publications/economic-reports/australia–value-of-aviation/)

Demand for pilots outstripping supply

Post COVID-19 Australian airlines are now in significant competition to international carriers who have reached into the Australian pilot population to fill their rank, offering large incentives for Australian pilots to accept positions abroad.

The Asia Pacific region is expected to need the highest number of new pilots globally, with over 91,000 required across the next decade, placing further pressure on Australia’s domestic industry.

(Reference:  https://centreforaviation.com/analysis/reports/the-global-pilot-shortage-is-a-challenge-to-the-worlds-airlines-658033)

Flight instructor snapshot

The Australian Government reports that there are 970 flight instructors employed nationally, representing a direct investment of over $150million in training and skills acquisition.

Flight instruction is a highly skilled technical vocation that requires significant direct financial investment of over $150,000 by each qualified pilot.

On average it takes some three years to become suitably qualified as a flight instructor.

(Reference:  https://www.jobsandskills.gov.au/data/labour-market-insights/occupations/231113-flying-instructors)

CASA approved flight training organisations

There are 419 flight training organisations that hold Civil Aviation Safety Authority approval nationwide.

(Reference:  https://www.casa.gov.au/search-centre/flight-training-operators)

CRICOS approved flight training providers

There are 50 CRICOS approved flight training providers nationwide.

Providers have reported to AOPA Australia that they expense substantial financial resources meeting the application, compliance and renewal requirements imposed by the system.

(Reference:  https://cricos.education.gov.au/Course/CourseSearch.aspx)

Department of Infrastructure:  Aviation White Paper – Towards 2050

The Australian Government released the Aviation White Paper on 26th August 2024, setting out the government’s vision for aviation towards 2050, identifying a range of key policies and initiatives that must be taken, including:

Simplifying the VISA process for pilots and other highly skilled aviation workers to address the shortage of pilots and instructors in the General Aviation sector and allow easier entry into the Australian labour market.

(Reference:  https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/awp-factsheet-regenerating-general-aviation.pdf)

Industry Skills Australia

Industry Skills Australia is a Job and Skills Council funded by the Australian Government Department of Employment and Workplace Relations.  ISA recognise that;

The Australian aviation industry is a crucial component of the country’s transportation infrastructure, connecting people and businesses both domestically and internationally.

Australia’s aviation sector was dramatically hit by COVID-19. By 2020, 38.5% of the industry’s workforce had been lost through early retirements or transition into more secure employment. In the post-pandemic environment, aviation has rebounded strongly with nearly 83% of COVID-19 induced stand downs being reversed.

Strong employment growth of 10.5% is forecast for the sector in the period to 2026.

(Reference:  https://www.industryskillsaustralia.org.au/our-industries/aviation)

Need an ASIC card – apply now

Draft instrument for Class 5 self declaration medical reform

AOPA class 5 medical self declaration reform

Article suplied by AOPA

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia encourages all of our members and national supporters to download the DRAFT CASA EX**/24 Instrument for Class 5 Self-Declaration and to provide your direct feedback to both the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Minister for Infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE DRAFT INSTRUMENT

Click to Download:   CASA EX**/24 – Class 5 Medical Self-Declarations Exemption 2023 – DRAFT

SUBMIT YOUR FEEDBACK TO:

Pip Spence
Director of Aviation Safety
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Email:  pip.spence@casa.gov.au

Catherine King MP
Minister for Infrastructure, Transport & Regional Development
Email:  Minister.King@mo.infrastructure.gov.au

Apply or renew your ASIC Card

Canberra airport to permanently displace runway 12 threshold

canberra airport to permanently displaced runway 12

Article supplied by AOPA

Canberra Airport is set to permanently displace the Runway 12 threshold, enabling the airport operator to activate further non-aviation property developments.“The displacement of Runway 12 results in an overall safety degradation and will negatively impact on operation of small to medium sized aircraft at Canberra Airport, ” Benjamin Morgan, CEO AOPA Australia.

“Lets be clear about what is going on at Canberra Airport… this is about non-aviation property development and the many millions of dollars of profit that it generates,“They’re displacing the Runway 12 threshold and shortening the runway, to enable them to erect buildings and structures beyond the end of the runway that would otherwise be prohibited so as to protect the safety of aviation users,“This is simply another stunning example of what airport privatisation has delivered for Australia’s aviation industry and community, its placed property development profits first and aviation capability and safety last. ” he said.AOPA Australia is calling on general aviation users to attend the upcoming briefing and to use the opportunity to raise your concerns:

Wednesday 26th October 2022 – 6pm to 8pm

ALASTAIR SWAYNE THEATRE

33-35 Brindabella Circuit Brindabella Business Park Canberra Airport ACTAOPA Australia has previously raised concerns for the future of Canberra Airport Runway 12/30, responding to the airport operators runway closure during COVID-19.

Read the full article here:  https://aopa.com.au/opinion-canberra-airport-cross…/Media contact:BENJAMIN MORGANCEO, AOPA AustraliaMobile: 0415 577 724Email: ben.morgan@aopa.com.auNOT A MEMBER? WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT!Join today: www.aopa.com.au/membership

Tenterfield Airport NSW: Council Seeks Sell-Off

Article supplied by AOPA

The future of Tenterfield Airport in New South Wales is at risk with news that the Tenterfield Shire Council is seeking a sell off of the community airport asset, with non-aviation property developers said to be circling.

Council CEO Daryl Buckingham, who has been in the job for less than 12 months, is said to have given clear instructions to the Council’s Development Manager Bruce Mills to scope out all saleable assets with the community airport at the top of the list.

Located 6km north west of the township of Tenterfield, the community airport was purchased by Council in 1967 and has been an invaluable base of operations for local aerial agriculture, aerial firefighting and emergency services.  The airfield is also used for local business and recreational private aviation.  The grass runway is approx 1300m in length.“Tenterfield is just another example in a growing list of airport sites that are facing the the real threat of sell-off, in response to spiraling local council debts nationwide – this is a crisis in the making, ” Benjamin Morgan, AOPA Australia CEO. “Such outcomes nationwide are serving to further displace aviation through the introduction of uncontrolled commercial fees and charges, undermining the viability of aviation services throughout regional Australia, “When privatised owners realise there is little money to be made from charging user fees, the very next thing they do is start redeveloping the sites for non-aviation use, “AOPA Australia is reaching out to the Councillors and Management of the Tenterfield Shire Council seeking an opportunity to discuss this important situation, “Our association is encouraging the Council to reject any proposal to sell-off this invaluable community asset, highlighting the important and ongoing contribution the airfield makes to the safety, security and amenity of the local ratepayers and region,” he said.

Pilot Medical Reform Proposal 2022

pilot medical reform AOPA

Article supplied by AOPA

The Australian General Aviation Alliance (AGAA) is seeking the introduction of new self-declaration pilot medical certification standard (detailed in Table 1 of this document) for Recreational Pilot License and Private Pilot License holders, along with key reforms to existing Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Class 2 Basic and Class 2 certification standards to safely unlock general aviation participation and growth.

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THE PROPOSAL

The reforms that AGAA is seeking, have been implemented by aviation safety regulators in the United States of America (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), and across the past five (5) years have proven to be a safe method of pilot medical certification.  Both regulators based their reforms on the use of conditional private vehicle motor car license medical standard, with options for both self-declaration and General Practitioner assessment certification.

In the US, the FAA BasicMed pilot medical certification is widely regarded as one of the most successful aviation regulatory reforms in modern history, with over 66,000 pilots now accessing flying through this standard, with no demonstrated negative impact on aviation safety.  The UK reforms mirror the success of those delivered in the US and have opened up their local general aviation industry to growth.

In summary, recreational/private pilots in both the US and UK who use either a self-declaration or General Practitioner assessed medical certification standards;

  1. must meet the medical fitness requirements of the ‘conditional’ private motor vehicle license standard
  2. can fly both single and multi-engine aircraft
  3. can fly aircraft weighing up to 5700 kg
  4. can participate in both VFR and IFR operations
  5. can carry up to a maximum of six (6) passengers
  6. can participate in aerobatic flight

The US now has in excess of 66,000 private pilots accessing aviation through BasicMed, with pilots participating in VFR and IFR operations in aircraft ranging between recreational light sport, experimental/amateur-built, general aviation certified singles and twins, helicopters, gyrocopters, warbirds and more.

AGAA regards both the introduction of a new self-declaration pilot medical certification standard and the reform of the CASA Basic Class 2 standard as a powerful gateway for the industry to sustain itself, reducing the regulatory burdens and costs currently imposed on the private general aviation sectors.  Such reform would make aviation more accessible nationwide, with strong benefits to pilots and aviation users throughout regional Australia, driving growth back into Australia’s ailing general aviation sectors.

Importantly, the introduction of a new self-declaration pilot medical certification standard and a reformed Basic Class 2 medical certification by CASA would deliver safe deregulation that is in alignment with the Minister’s Statement of Expectations and the Government’s broader deregulation agenda.

Sincerely,

MR BENJAMIN MORGAN
Chairman
 – Australian General Aviation Alliance
Chief Executive – Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia

C/O Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia
Hangar 120, 15 Stinson Crescent, Bankstown Airport, NSW 2200, Australia.

Email:  ben.morgan@aopa.com.au
Mobile:  0415 577 724

Airservices Australia seeks to decommission Bankstown & Camden airport beacons

decommission bankstown airport beacons

Article supplied by AOPA

Airservices is seeking industry feedback to understand if there is any operational requirement or impact on removal for the Bankstown and Camden aerodrome beacons before a decision for its decommissioning can be made.Changes to MOS 139 have removed the mandatory requirement for an Aerodrome Beacon and the evolution of other aerodrome lighting and the expansion of GNSS navigation capabilities across all levels of the industry means that that the historical need for an aerodrome beacon has changed considerably.Airservices Australia is proposing to decommission both the Bankstown and Camden Aerodrome Beacons (ABN) and remove them from operational service. Airservices has completed an internal risk assessment, consistent with our Safety Management System (SMS), for the decommissioning of the Bankstown and Camden Airport aerodrome beacons and identified a negligable impact on industry.

FEEDBACK SURVEY LINK:Airservices invites you to provide feedback using the survey form link provided below:https://engage.airservicesaustralia.com/…/bankstowncamd…

NOT A MEMBER? WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT! Join today: www.aopa.com.au/membership

AOPA Australia | Your Freedom to Fly

No increase in threshold monetary value for major development plans at privatised airports

Article supplied by AOPA Australia. The Department of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development and Communications has announced that it has scrapped its plan to increase the threshold monetary value for Major Development Plans from $25 to $35million at privatised airports, following strong objections from AOPA Australia and other industry bodies.

Under the Airports Act 1996, all leased federal airports, excluding Mount Isa and Tennant Creek, are required to develop and submit Major Development Plans (MDP) for airport developments if they exceed the monetary threshold of $25million.  An increase to $35million would enable airport property developers to undertake larger non-aviation projects without Ministerial or Departmental oversight.

“AOPA Australia would like to sincerely thank the Deputy Prime Minister, The Hon Barnaby Joyce MP, and the Department of Infrastructure, on this important announcement, it is an important win for common-sense and for aviation, “ Benjamin Morgan, Chief Executive AOPA Australia.

“The proposal to increase the monetary value from $25 to $35million, would have served to lower essential oversight, opening up the system to further gaming by privatised airport leaseholder operators,

“It’s a fact that privatised airports are being run by insatiable property developers who are prioritising non-aviation expansion, at the expense and to the detriment of the aviation infrastructure and stakeholder access,

“Small, medium and large aviation businesses alike, including the airlines themselves, have been thrust into a situation where they are being priced out of airports, and forced to accept aviation property leases and access/user charges that are unsustainable.

“National superannuation funds and billion-dollar property development corporations do not invest in small to medium sized general aviation.  They invest in property development, and the recent sale of Jandakot Airport for $1billion underscores, that our national aviation industry is under attack,

“Without question, privatised airport leaseholders hold unique unregulated monopoly powers, that deny the aviation industry it’s right of access and threaten our nations aviation infrastructure.” he said.

Media contact:

BENJAMIN MORGAN
Chief Executive AOPA Australia
Mobile:  0415 577 724
Email:  ben.morgan@aopa.com.au

STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE, 29TH SEPTEMBER 2021

Good afternoon,

We write further to our email of 30 August 2021 about the monetary threshold amount (the threshold) for airport major development plans (MDPs).

Under the subsection 89(10) of the Airports Act 1996 (the Act), there is an opportunity to increase the threshold for MDPs before each third anniversary of the subsection commencing. The subsection commenced on 28 September 2018.

Recent economic analysis conducted by the Department, and consultation with airports and the aviation sector, indicated greater interest in broader reform to the MDP process and associated triggers due to complexities that warrant further consideration. These include:

  • reviewing the development ‘triggers’ that require a MDP, to ensure the triggers are pragmatic, appropriate and fit-for-purpose;
  • improving consultation arrangements, to better align with state and territory planning frameworks; and
  • streamlining Commonwealth consideration and approval processes, particularly for low-impact developments.

Taking all stakeholder feedback into consideration, the threshold will remain at $25 million in line with subsection 89(9) of the Act while the Department investigates opportunities to reform and streamline overarching MDP arrangements. This may include moving towards a performance-based approach, where the assessment and approval process is more directly linked to the expected impacts of particular developments.

The Department is currently reviewing the Airports Act 1996 and regulations, to cut red tape, streamline Commonwealth processes and modernise airport planning regulations. The Department looks forward to working closely with airports and the aviation sector in progressing these important reforms, and support the sector as Australia recovers from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kind regards,

Aviation Reform section
aviationreform@infrastructure.gov.au
GPO Box 594 Canberra, ACT 2601

Full article: https://aopa.com.au/plans-scrapped-no-increase-in-threshold-monetary-value-for-major-development-plans-at-privatised-airports/

AOPA Australia Submission: Removal of anti-competitive regulatory restrictions on flight training

Article: AOPA Australia The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia this past week met with CASA CEO Ms Pip Spence, calling for the removal of anti-competitive regulatory restrictions, that are driving decline in general aviation flight training.

Article: AOPA Australia The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association of Australia this past week met with CASA CEO Ms Pip Spence, calling for the removal of anti-competitive regulatory restrictions, that are driving decline in general aviation flight training.

The AOPA Australia Submission is based on the COAG’s Competition Principles Agreement that have not been applied to aviation regulatory development since 2003.  AOPA Australia asserts that anti-competitive aviation regulations have been created since 2003 that have restricted safe competitive growth of small businesses by removing safe competitive regulations consistent to the Chicago Convention Annexes as implemented by the USA’s Federal Aviation Regulations. NZ has adopted the FARs and NZ small aviation and manufacturing are much healthier than Australia’s small civil aviation sectors.

Click to download a PDF Copy of the AOPA Australia Submission

Article written by Benjamin Morgan – AOPA Australia